![]() ![]() However, there are far fewer 'serious hackers' than there are script thiefs - and it takes a much greater skill to sift through reverse engineered assembly than it does C# with all variable names etc still in tact! The idea od encrypting script files can make sense I guess if one were to sell completed scripts for certain function that were difficult to code - for example lets say someone writes a Matrix style go-slow-rotating-flying-through-the-air-slowed-sound-etc script that could be applied to a camera on a trigger (say a bullet firing etc) - then they may wish to sell this item, but do not want everyone just copy/paste the code and making a myriad of alternatives from it to water down his original work's value - so he sells an encrypted version and keeps the source script to himself. Of course a serious cracker uses an MC level disassembler and in-memory tracer and simply steps through the running code in Assembler - this is why there is no such thing as an uncrackable software product that requires installing (server based products are safer in this regard as they limit the access to the binaries). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |